Lattice vs Leapsome: Complete 2026 Comparison
Compare two leading people management platforms. Find the best solution for performance reviews, OKRs, engagement surveys, learning, and compensation based on features, pricing, and team size.
Watch: Lattice vs Leapsome
Platform Comparison at a Glance
We've evaluated both platforms across key criteria including features, pricing, usability, and target market. Here's a quick overview to help you make an informed decision:
| Platform | Rating | Pricing | Countries | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive people management with performance reviews, OKRs, engagement, compensation, and career development | 8.8/10 (1400 reviews) | $$$ Starts at $11/person/month for Performance; add-ons for Engagement ($4), Grow ($4), Compensation ($6) | Available globally | Mid-market to enterprise (200-5000+ employees) |
All-in-one people enablement platform combining performance reviews, engagement surveys, OKRs, learning, and compensation | 8.9/10 (800 reviews) | $$-$$$ Starts at $8/person/month; modular pricing for Reviews, Goals, Surveys, Learning | Available globally, strong in Europe and US | Mid-market organisations (100-3000 employees) |
Detailed Platform Analysis
In-depth review of each platform's features, pricing, strengths, and limitations to help you choose the right solution for your performance management needs.
Lattice
Key Features
- •Customisable performance review cycles with multi-stage workflows and 360-degree feedback
- •OKR and goal tracking with cascade alignment across company, department, and individual levels
- •AI-powered engagement surveys with predictive analytics and turnover risk insights
- •Comprehensive compensation benchmarking, pay equity analysis, and merit cycle management
- •Robust people analytics dashboard with actionable workforce insights
- •Extensive integration library including Slack, Teams, BambooHR, Workday, and 20+ connectors
Limitations
- •Higher price point when adding multiple modules together
- •Can be complex to configure for smaller or less technical teams
- •Some users report a steeper learning curve during initial setup
- •Each module (Engagement, Grow, Compensation) adds incremental cost
Best For:
Mid-market to enterprise companies that need a comprehensive people management platform combining performance reviews, OKRs, engagement, and compensation in one place.
Leapsome
Key Features
- •Flexible performance review cycles with customisable templates, 360-degree feedback, and calibration
- •OKR and goal management with real-time alignment and progress visualisation across teams
- •Engagement surveys with granular analytics, benchmarking, and actionable recommendations
- •Built-in learning paths and competency frameworks for structured employee development
- •Compensation management with review-linked pay decisions and equity analysis
- •European data compliance with GDPR-first architecture and EU hosting options
Limitations
- •Smaller integration marketplace compared to larger US-based competitors
- •Less brand recognition in North America than Lattice or other established players
- •Newer platform with a shorter track record than some enterprise alternatives
- •Smaller partner and consulting ecosystem for implementation support
Best For:
European-headquartered or mid-market companies wanting an all-in-one people enablement platform with strong data compliance, built-in learning, and modular pricing.
Comprehensive Feature Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key features to help you understand what each platform offers for your performance management and people enablement needs.
Performance Reviews
Goals & Learning
| Feature Category | Lattice | Leapsome |
|---|---|---|
Performance Philosophy | Excellent Structured review cycles Highly configurable multi-stage review workflows with 360 feedback and calibration | Excellent Continuous performance enablement Flexible review cycles combined with ongoing feedback and development focus |
Goal & OKR Management | Excellent OKRs with cascade alignment Company, department, and individual goals with progress tracking and alignment | Excellent Real-time OKR alignment Visual goal trees with real-time progress tracking and cross-team alignment |
Learning & Development | Limited Career development via Grow Growth plans and career tracks available through the Grow add-on module | Excellent Built-in learning paths Integrated LMS with structured learning paths, competency frameworks, and skill tracking |
Analytics & Reporting | Excellent Advanced people analytics AI-driven insights, engagement trends, predictive analytics, and custom dashboards | Good Good reporting suite Dashboard with engagement metrics, review analytics, and benchmarking data |
European Data Compliance | Good GDPR compliant Supports GDPR compliance with standard data protection measures | Excellent GDPR-first, EU hosting Built with GDPR-first architecture, EU data hosting options, and European data residency |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about choosing between Lattice and Leapsome for your performance management needs.
Which platform is better for small businesses?
Leapsome is generally a better fit for smaller organisations thanks to its lower starting price ($8/person/month vs $11) and more intuitive interface with a usability score of 9.0. Its modular pricing lets you start with just Reviews or Goals and add modules as you grow. Lattice is better suited for mid-market and enterprise companies that need a more comprehensive suite from day one.
How do Lattice and Leapsome compare for OKR management?
Both platforms offer excellent OKR and goal management. Lattice provides sophisticated cascade alignment where company goals flow down to departments and individuals, with strong progress tracking. Leapsome offers real-time goal alignment with visual progress tracking and tighter integration with its review cycles. Both are strong choices, though Lattice may edge ahead for very large organisations with complex goal hierarchies.
Which platform is better for European companies?
Leapsome has a clear advantage for European companies. Headquartered in Berlin, it was built with GDPR-first architecture and offers EU data hosting options. Its interface and support are designed with European work culture in mind. Lattice is available globally and supports GDPR compliance, but its primary focus and data centres are US-based.
Does Leapsome have better learning features than Lattice?
Yes, Leapsome includes built-in learning paths and competency frameworks as a core part of its platform. You can create structured development programmes, assign learning content, and link skill development directly to performance reviews. Lattice offers career development through its Grow module but does not include the same depth of integrated learning management.
How does pricing compare between Lattice and Leapsome?
Leapsome starts at $8/person/month with modular pricing, while Lattice starts at $11/person/month for its Performance module alone. When you add Lattice's Engagement ($4), Grow ($4), and Compensation ($6) modules, the total can reach $25/person/month. Leapsome's all-in-one approach often provides more features at a lower total cost, particularly for mid-market companies.
How long does implementation take for each platform?
Both platforms can be set up relatively quickly. Leapsome typically takes 2-4 weeks for a standard implementation thanks to its intuitive setup wizard and pre-built templates. Lattice implementation usually takes 4-8 weeks depending on the number of modules and complexity of configuration, especially for larger enterprises with custom workflows.