Oyster vs Globalization Partners: Complete 2025 Comparison
Compare two leading global employment platforms. Find the perfect EOR solution for your international hiring needs based on features, pricing, regional expertise, and business requirements.
Platform Comparison at a Glance
We've evaluated both platforms across key criteria including features, pricing, usability, and target market. Here's a quick overview to help you make an informed decision:
Platform | Rating | Pricing | Countries | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oyster Remote-first companies | 9/10 (300 reviews) | $$$ EOR: Starts at $499/month (annual) or $599/month (monthly) | 180+ | Startups and SMBs |
Globalization Partners Complex compliance and legal needs | 8.8/10 (250 reviews) | $$$$ Custom pricing based on services and location | 180+ | Large enterprises |
Detailed Platform Analysis
In-depth review of each platform's features, pricing, strengths, and limitations to help you choose the right solution for your global employment needs.
Oyster
Key Features
- •User-friendly and intuitive platform
- •Transparent, tiered pricing
- •Global payroll and benefits administration
- •Streamlined onboarding process
- •Integrations with popular HR and accounting software
- •Good customer support
Limitations
- •Platform can be basic with limited customization
- •Onboarding process can sometimes be tedious
- •Newer company with a shorter track record
- •Fewer advanced features than some competitors
Best For:
Startups and remote-first companies prioritizing user experience and transparent pricing.
Globalization Partners
Key Features
- •Robust compliance framework and extensive network of in-country legal experts
- •Localized HR expertise and proactive updates on changing employment laws
- •AI-powered tools to help navigate global HR and compliance complexities
- •Responsive and knowledgeable customer support
- •Comprehensive legal and compliance support
- •Extensive global reach
Limitations
- •Pricing is on the higher end and not transparent
- •Platform can be more complex than what smaller businesses require
- •Not as focused on remote-first companies
- •Less flexible pricing models
Best For:
Large enterprises with complex compliance and legal needs requiring robust support.
Comprehensive Feature Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key features to help you understand what each platform offers for your global employment and contractor management needs.
Core EOR Services
Technology & Integration
Feature Category | Oyster | Globalization Partners |
---|---|---|
Global Coverage | Excellent 180+ countries Wide country coverage with a focus on remote-first companies | Excellent 180+ countries Extensive global reach with a long-standing reputation |
Pricing Structure | Excellent Starts at $499/month EOR (annual) Transparent, tiered pricing with no hidden costs | Good Custom pricing Positioned as a premium service with less transparent pricing |
Compliance | Good Strong compliance framework Focus on compliance for remote-first companies | Excellent Robust compliance and risk management Extensive experience and in-country expertise |
Integrations | Good Growing list of integrations Offers an API and integrates with various HR tools | Excellent Extensive integrations Integrates with a wide range of HRIS and ERP systems |
Customer Support | Good Good customer support Some users have noted that the onboarding process can sometimes be tedious | Excellent Strong customer support Responsive and knowledgeable customer support is frequently praised |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about choosing between Oyster and Globalization Partners for your global employment needs.
Which platform is more expensive?
Globalization Partners is generally more expensive than Oyster. Oyster has a transparent, tiered pricing model, while Globalization Partners has a custom pricing model that is tailored to the specific services required, the employee's salary, and the country of employment.
What is the main difference between Oyster and Globalization Partners?
The main difference between Oyster and Globalization Partners is their target audience and pricing model. Oyster is geared towards startups and SMBs with a user-friendly platform and transparent pricing. Globalization Partners is better suited for large enterprises with complex compliance and legal needs, and has a more customized and premium pricing structure.
Which platform is better for a small business?
Oyster is generally a better choice for small businesses. Its user-friendly platform, transparent pricing, and focus on remote-first companies make it an excellent choice for startups and SMBs that are new to global hiring.
Which platform is better for a large enterprise?
Globalization Partners is often a better choice for large enterprises. Its robust compliance framework, extensive network of in-country legal experts, and dedicated customer support make it a good fit for companies with more complex global expansion needs.
Which platform has better global coverage?
Both companies have extensive global coverage, with a presence in over 180 countries.
Which platform has better customer support?
Both companies are known for their strong customer support. Globalization Partners is frequently commended for its responsive and knowledgeable customer support. Oyster also has good customer support, but some users have noted that the onboarding process can sometimes be tedious.