Oyster vs Omnipresent: Complete 2025 Comparison
Compare two leading global employment platforms. Find the perfect EOR solution for your international hiring needs based on features, pricing, regional expertise, and business requirements.
Platform Comparison at a Glance
We've evaluated both platforms across key criteria including features, pricing, usability, and target market. Here's a quick overview to help you make an informed decision:
| Platform | Rating | Pricing | Countries | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Oyster Remote-first teams | 9/10 (300 reviews) | $$$ EOR: Starts at $599/month (or $499/month if paid annually) | 180+ | Startups and small-to-mid-sized companies |
Omnipresent Compliance and high-touch support | 8.9/10 (200 reviews) | $$$ Starts at $499/month | 160+ | Mid-sized companies (50-500 employees) |
Detailed Platform Analysis
In-depth review of each platform's features, pricing, strengths, and limitations to help you choose the right solution for your global employment needs.
Oyster
Key Features
- •User-friendly platform with a focus on remote-first features
- •Transparent pricing structure
- •Wide country coverage for hiring and payments
- •Integrations with various HR tools like BambooHR, Greenhouse, and Slack
- •Positive employee experience
- •Good customer support
Limitations
- •Reliance on third-party vendors in some regions
- •Less in-depth reporting and analytics features
- •Basic built-in Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
- •Newer company with a shorter track record
Best For:
Startups and remote-first companies that value a user-friendly platform, transparent pricing, and a strong focus on the employee experience.
Omnipresent
Key Features
- •Strong focus on compliance and navigating local labor laws
- •Versatile employment options (EOR, PEO, contractor management)
- •Human-led, high-touch support with subject matter experts
- •Streamlined operations
- •Good customer support
- •User-friendly platform
Limitations
- •Can be more expensive than some alternatives
- •Less transparent pricing, often requiring direct consultation
- •Growing, but still limited, integration ecosystem for enterprise applications
- •Slightly smaller global reach than Oyster
Best For:
Mid-sized companies expanding into new international markets and requiring robust compliance support and access to local expertise.
Comprehensive Feature Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key features to help you understand what each platform offers for your global employment and contractor management needs.
Core EOR Services
Technology & Integration
| Feature Category | Oyster | Omnipresent |
|---|---|---|
Global Coverage | Excellent 180+ countries Wide country coverage with a focus on remote-first companies | Good 160+ countries Mix of direct legal entities and partner-led support |
Pricing Structure | Excellent Starts at $499/month EOR (annual) Transparent, tiered pricing with no hidden costs | Good Starts at $499/month EOR Can vary depending on the country and services required |
Compliance | Good Strong compliance framework Focus on compliance for remote-first companies | Excellent Robust compliance and risk management Extensive experience and in-country expertise |
Integrations | Good Growing list of integrations Offers an API and integrates with various HR tools | Excellent Extensive integrations Integrates with a wide range of HRIS and ERP systems |
Customer Support | Good Good customer support Some users have noted that the onboarding process can sometimes be tedious | Excellent Strong customer support Responsive and knowledgeable customer support is frequently praised |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about choosing between Oyster and Omnipresent for your global employment needs.
Which platform is more expensive?
Omnipresent can be more expensive than Oyster, with a starting price of $499 per employee per month. Oyster's pricing starts at $599 per employee per month, but they offer a discounted rate of $499 per month for annual plans. Omnipresent's pricing is also less transparent and often requires a custom quote.
What is the main difference between Oyster and Omnipresent?
The main difference between Oyster and Omnipresent is their approach and target audience. Oyster is favored by startups and remote-first companies for its user-friendly platform and transparent pricing. Omnipresent is often the choice for mid-sized companies that prioritize compliance and high-touch, expert support, even at a potentially higher cost.
Which platform is better for a small business?
Oyster is generally a better choice for small businesses. Its user-friendly platform, transparent pricing, and focus on remote-first companies make it an excellent choice for startups and SMBs that are new to global hiring.
Which platform is better for a large enterprise?
Omnipresent is often a better choice for large enterprises. Its robust compliance support, access to local expertise, and versatile employment options make it a good fit for companies with more complex global expansion needs.
Which platform has better global coverage?
Oyster has a slightly larger global reach, with a presence in over 180 countries, compared to Omnipresent's 160+ countries.
Which platform has better customer support?
Both platforms are known for their good customer support. Oyster is praised for its positive employee experience, while Omnipresent is known for its human-led, high-touch support with subject matter experts.