Rippling vs Gusto: Complete 2025 Comparison
Compare two leading global employment platforms. Find the perfect EOR solution for your international hiring needs based on features, pricing, regional expertise, and business requirements.
Platform Comparison at a Glance
We've evaluated both platforms across key criteria including features, pricing, usability, and target market. Here's a quick overview to help you make an informed decision:
| Platform | Rating | Pricing | Countries | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rippling Unified platform for HR, IT, and finance, extensive automation, and device management | 9.1/10 (1200 reviews) | $$$ Starts at $8/user/month + EOR services between $499-$599/employee/month | Hires employees in over 50 countries and contractors in over 185 | Medium to large enterprises needing extensive integrations and global workforce management |
Gusto User-friendly interface, strong compliance support for US payroll, and integrated benefits administration | 8.9/10 (1800 reviews) | $$ $599/employee/month, with discounts available | Hires full-time employees in 12 countries and contractors in over 120 | Small to medium-sized US-based businesses |
Detailed Platform Analysis
In-depth review of each platform's features, pricing, strengths, and limitations to help you choose the right solution for your global employment needs.
Rippling
Key Features
- •Unified platform for HR, IT, and finance
- •Extensive automation and device management capabilities
- •Significantly larger global footprint than Gusto
- •Over 600 app integrations
- •Powerful, unified platform that centralizes a wide range of functions
- •Good customer support
Limitations
- •Modular pricing can be complex and harder to estimate
- •May be too complex for very small businesses
- •Some features may require a learning curve
- •Support can be less personalized than Gusto
Best For:
Medium to large enterprises needing extensive integrations and global workforce management.
Gusto
Key Features
- •User-friendly interface and straightforward payroll processing
- •Transparent pricing and strong compliance support for US labor laws
- •EOR services offered in partnership with Remote
- •Over 200 third-party app integrations
- •Simplicity and ease of use, making it accessible for those without an HR background
- •Good customer support
Limitations
- •Significantly smaller global footprint than Rippling
- •Less extensive and integrated feature set than Rippling
- •Less automation and device management capabilities
- •Not as suitable for businesses with a large global workforce
Best For:
Small to medium-sized US-based businesses that prioritize a user-friendly interface and straightforward payroll processing.
Comprehensive Feature Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of key features to help you understand what each platform offers for your global employment and contractor management needs.
Core EOR Services
Technology & Integration
| Feature Category | Rippling | Gusto |
|---|---|---|
Global Employment Model | Excellent Native EOR service Manages global employees within its own unified platform | Good Partnered EOR service Relies on Remote for EOR services |
Pricing Structure | Good Modular pricing Flexible, but can become complex and costly | Excellent Transparent pricing Clear tiers and per-employee costs |
IT Management | Excellent Includes device and app management Unified platform for HR, IT, and finance | Limited Does not specialize in IT management Focus on HR and compliance |
Integrations | Excellent Extensive integrations with over 600 apps Connects with a wide range of business software | Good Integrates with over 200 third-party apps Good integration capabilities, but not as extensive as Rippling |
Customer Support | Good Good customer support Support can be less personalized than Gusto | Excellent Highly rated customer support Praised for its simplicity and ease of use |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about choosing between Rippling and Gusto for your global employment needs.
Which platform is more expensive?
It's difficult to say for sure, as Rippling's modular pricing can be more flexible but also harder to estimate without a custom quote. Gusto's pricing is more transparent, with clear tiers and per-employee costs.
What is the main difference between Rippling and Gusto?
The main difference between Rippling and Gusto is their target audience and global capabilities. Rippling is ideal for businesses with a global workforce, while Gusto is an excellent choice for small to medium-sized U.S.-based businesses.
Which platform is better for a small business?
Gusto is generally a better choice for small businesses. Its user-friendly interface, transparent pricing, and strong compliance support for US labor laws make it an excellent choice for small to medium-sized U.S.-based businesses.
Which platform is better for a large enterprise?
Rippling is often a better choice for large enterprises. Its unified platform for HR, IT, and finance, as well as its extensive automation and integration capabilities, make it a good fit for companies with more complex global HR needs.
Which platform has better global coverage?
Rippling has a significantly larger global footprint, with the ability to hire employees in over 50 countries and contractors in over 185. Gusto hires full-time employees in 12 countries and contractors in over 120.
Which platform has better customer support?
Both platforms are highly rated for their customer support. However, the best choice for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.