Back to HR Software
Last Updated: March 2026

Top 10 360-Degree Feedback Software Compared

An in-depth comparison of the leading 360-degree feedback solutions to help you find the right multi-rater feedback platform for driving employee development, identifying blind spots, and building a culture of continuous improvement at your organization.

Watch: 360-Degree Feedback Software Guide

360-Degree Feedback Software Guide

Comparison Criteria

Pricing

$ = Budget (Under $5/user/mo)
$$ = Mid-range ($5-15/user/mo)
$$$ = Premium ($15-25/user/mo)
$$$$ = Enterprise (Custom pricing)

User Rating

Based on verified reviews across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius platforms. Rating out of 5.

Usability

Ease of use rating based on user interface intuitiveness, onboarding experience, and admin complexity.

Company Size

The ideal organization size where the solution performs best based on features, scalability, and pricing.

Lattice logo

1. Lattice

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month (annual billing)
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (920 reviews)
(4.7/5)
Usability
(4.8/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Comprehensive 360 review cycles
  • Customizable feedback questionnaires
  • Anonymous multi-rater assessments
  • Performance and feedback integration
  • Real-time feedback and recognition
Limitations
  • Price increases with added modules
  • Some advanced features only in higher tiers
  • Limited customization for smaller plans
  • 360 feedback requires performance module
Best For: Companies wanting comprehensive 360 feedback integrated with performance management
Visit Website
Culture Amp logo

2. Culture Amp

$$$
Pricing Model
Per employee/year
Company Size
Mid-size to Enterprise
User Rating (780 reviews)
(4.5/5)
Usability
(4.4/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Research-backed 360 survey templates
  • Science-driven competency models
  • Advanced anonymity controls
  • Benchmark data from thousands of organizations
  • AI-powered feedback insights
Limitations
  • Higher pricing tier
  • Complex implementation for all features
  • Advanced analytics can be overwhelming
  • Requires strong admin support
Best For: Data-driven organizations wanting research-backed 360 feedback with robust benchmarking
15Five logo

3. 15Five

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month (annual billing)
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (850 reviews)
(4.6/5)
Usability
(4.7/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Lightweight 360 feedback workflows
  • Peer and upward feedback
  • Weekly check-ins with feedback prompts
  • Manager effectiveness surveys
  • Integration with engagement tools
Limitations
  • Limited enterprise reporting
  • Basic integration options
  • 360 features less robust than dedicated tools
  • Higher price for full feature set
Best For: Growing teams seeking lightweight 360 feedback combined with continuous check-ins
Leapsome logo

4. Leapsome

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month (annual billing)
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (620 reviews)
(4.8/5)
Usability
(4.7/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Highly customizable multi-rater feedback
  • Flexible reviewer nomination workflows
  • Competency framework mapping
  • Automated 360 review cycle scheduling
  • Development-focused feedback reports
Limitations
  • Newer platform with smaller user community
  • Some features still maturing
  • Limited third-party integrations
  • Reporting could be more robust
Best For: Organizations wanting highly customizable multi-rater feedback with development focus
PerformYard logo

5. PerformYard

$$
Pricing Model
Per employee/month
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (580 reviews)
(4.5/5)
Usability
(4.6/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Flexible 360 review cycle configuration
  • Customizable rating scales and questions
  • Multi-source feedback collection
  • Goal alignment with feedback data
  • Automated reminders and notifications
Limitations
  • Limited advanced analytics
  • Fewer built-in templates than competitors
  • Basic reporting functionality
  • Limited integration options
Best For: Organizations wanting flexible, customizable 360 review cycles without complexity
Small Improvements logo

6. Small Improvements

$$
Pricing Model
Per active user/month
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (490 reviews)
(4.5/5)
Usability
(4.7/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Simple peer-to-peer feedback
  • 360 feedback with intuitive interface
  • Anonymous and transparent feedback options
  • Praise and recognition wall
  • Lightweight feedback request workflows
Limitations
  • Limited advanced reporting
  • Fewer enterprise features
  • Basic competency mapping
  • Limited advanced workflow customization
Best For: Small to medium businesses seeking simple, intuitive peer feedback without complexity
SurveySparrow logo

7. SurveySparrow

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (430 reviews)
(4.4/5)
Usability
(4.5/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Conversational 360 survey format
  • Chat-like feedback experience
  • Multi-language support for global teams
  • Automated recurring feedback cycles
  • Visual analytics dashboards
Limitations
  • Less focused on HR-specific features
  • Limited performance management integration
  • Fewer competency frameworks built in
  • Survey tool first, HR tool second
Best For: Organizations wanting engaging, conversational 360 surveys with high response rates
Engagedly logo

8. Engagedly

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (480 reviews)
(4.4/5)
Usability
(4.2/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Multi-rater feedback with social recognition
  • Configurable 360 assessment templates
  • Competency-based evaluations
  • Goal alignment with feedback insights
  • Gamification and engagement features
Limitations
  • Interface can be busy
  • Feature-rich but can be overwhelming
  • Mobile app has limited functionality
  • Some customization limitations
Best For: Companies seeking multi-rater feedback combined with social recognition and engagement
Trakstar logo

9. Trakstar

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month (annual billing)
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (520 reviews)
(4.3/5)
Usability
(4.3/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • 360 feedback with goal alignment
  • Automated review scheduling
  • Customizable competency models
  • Multi-rater evaluation workflows
  • Performance trend tracking
Limitations
  • UI feels dated compared to newer tools
  • Limited advanced analytics
  • Fewer integration options
  • Basic mobile experience
Best For: Teams looking for 360 feedback tightly connected to goal tracking and performance reviews
Primalogik logo

10. Primalogik

$$
Pricing Model
Per user/month
Company Size
Small to Mid-size
User Rating (340 reviews)
(4.6/5)
Usability
(4.5/5)
Mobile-Friendly
Yes
Continuous Feedback
Yes
Key Features
  • Dedicated 360 feedback platform
  • Customizable multi-rater surveys
  • Anonymous feedback with confidentiality controls
  • Visual competency gap reports
  • Instant feedback and pulse surveys
Limitations
  • Smaller vendor with less brand recognition
  • Limited enterprise scalability
  • Fewer third-party integrations
  • Smaller customer support team
Best For: Organizations wanting a dedicated, purpose-built 360-degree feedback platform

How to Select the Right 360-Degree Feedback Software

Define Your Feedback Model

Before choosing a platform, clarify the type of 360-degree feedback model that aligns with your organization's goals. Are you implementing full-circle reviews involving managers, peers, direct reports, and self-assessments, or a lighter peer feedback approach? Some organizations use 360 feedback primarily for development, while others tie it to performance evaluations. Understanding your model will help you identify platforms with the right depth of multi-rater capabilities, nomination workflows, and reporting structures.

Evaluate Anonymity Controls

Anonymity is one of the most critical factors in 360-degree feedback. Employees need to trust that their responses are confidential to provide honest, candid input. Evaluate how each platform handles anonymity settings, minimum response thresholds before results are shared, and controls that prevent identification of individual respondents. The best tools offer configurable anonymity levels so you can adjust transparency based on your organization's culture and the purpose of the feedback cycle.

Consider Assessment Customization

Effective 360 feedback relies on well-crafted questions tailored to your organization's competency frameworks and values. Look for platforms that offer flexible questionnaire builders, pre-built competency libraries, and the ability to create role-specific assessment templates. The right tool should let you mix rating scales, open-ended questions, and behavioral indicators while maintaining consistency across review cycles. Consider whether the platform supports different question sets for different rater groups, such as managers versus peers.

Review Reporting & Analytics

The value of 360 feedback depends on how effectively results are communicated and analyzed. Evaluate each platform's reporting capabilities, including individual development reports, team-level summaries, and organization-wide trend analysis. Look for tools that visualize competency gaps, compare self-perception against peer ratings, and highlight strengths and development areas clearly. Advanced platforms offer heat maps, spider charts, and benchmarking data that make feedback actionable for both employees and their managers.

Assess Integration Needs

360-degree feedback is most powerful when connected to your broader HR ecosystem. Consider how each platform integrates with your existing HRIS, performance management system, learning management system, and communication tools. Seamless integrations ensure that feedback data flows into development plans, informs performance reviews, and triggers relevant learning recommendations. Native integrations with tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and major HRIS platforms reduce administrative overhead and improve the overall feedback experience.

Current Trends in 360-Degree Feedback Technology

AI-Powered Feedback Analysis

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing how organizations process and interpret 360-degree feedback data. Modern platforms use natural language processing to analyze open-ended responses, detect sentiment patterns, and surface recurring themes across feedback. AI can identify potential bias in ratings, suggest areas where feedback may be inconsistent, and even generate personalized development recommendations based on multi-rater input. This technology transforms raw feedback into actionable insights at scale.

Continuous 360 Feedback

The traditional model of annual 360 reviews is giving way to continuous, ongoing multi-rater feedback. Leading platforms now support lightweight, frequent feedback exchanges that complement formal review cycles. This approach allows employees to receive timely input from multiple sources throughout the year, enabling faster course correction and more relevant development conversations. Continuous 360 feedback also reduces the recency bias that plagues traditional annual assessments.

Competency-Based Frameworks

Organizations are increasingly anchoring 360 feedback to well-defined competency frameworks that align with business strategy. Modern platforms offer robust competency libraries, role-specific behavioral indicators, and the ability to map feedback directly to skill development paths. This structured approach ensures that feedback is focused, measurable, and directly connected to the capabilities organizations need most. Competency-based 360 feedback also provides clearer benchmarks for tracking growth over time.

Real-Time Multi-Source Feedback

Beyond traditional 360 surveys, platforms are incorporating real-time feedback from multiple sources including project-based assessments, cross-functional team evaluations, and client or stakeholder input. This expanded view provides a richer, more holistic picture of performance and collaboration effectiveness. Real-time collection also captures feedback when it is most relevant, immediately after key interactions, presentations, or project milestones, resulting in more specific and useful input.

DEI-Informed Feedback

Diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations are shaping how 360-degree feedback tools are designed and implemented. Advanced platforms now include bias detection algorithms that flag potentially biased language or rating patterns, ensuring feedback is fair and equitable across demographic groups. Some tools offer DEI-specific competency models and inclusive leadership assessments. These features help organizations use 360 feedback as a tool for building more inclusive cultures rather than reinforcing existing biases.

Skill-Gap Identification

360-degree feedback is increasingly being used as a strategic tool for identifying and closing skill gaps across the organization. Modern platforms aggregate multi-rater data to map individual and team-level competency gaps, then connect those insights to targeted learning and development resources. This capability transforms 360 feedback from a retrospective evaluation tool into a forward-looking workforce planning instrument, helping organizations build the skills they need to execute their strategy.

Need Help Selecting the Right 360-Degree Feedback Software?

Our HR technology experts can provide personalized recommendations based on your organization's feedback culture, anonymity requirements, and development goals.

Schedule a Free ConsultationLearn About Our Selection Process
PRSPRS Consultancy

Expert HR technology consulting, software reviews, and resources to help organisations build better workplaces and make smarter people decisions.

Solutions

  • Software Reviews
  • EOR Comparisons
  • Vendor Reviews
  • HR Tools
  • Consulting Services

© 2026 PRS Consultancy. All rights reserved.

Helping organisations make better people decisions